Cullen

The Consultation Letters of Dr William Cullen (1710-1790) at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

 

[ID:3908] From: Dr William Cullen (Professor Cullen) / To: [ADDRESSEE UNKNOWN] / Regarding: Mr Hall (Patient) / 20 August 1776 / (Outgoing)

Reply headed 'For Mr. H.' [Mr Hall?] in which Cullen argues against considering his present symptoms venereal.

Facsimile

There are 2 images for this document.

[Page 1]


 

[Page 2]


 
 

Metadata

FieldData
DOC ID 3908
RCPE Catalogue Number CUL/1/1/8/20
Main Language English
Document Direction Outgoing
Date20 August 1776
Annotation None
TypeScribal copy ( includes Casebook Entry)
Enclosure(s) No enclosure(s)
Autopsy No
Recipe No
Regimen No
Letter of Introduction No
Case Note No
Summary Reply headed 'For Mr. H.' [Mr Hall?] in which Cullen argues against considering his present symptoms venereal.
Manuscript Incomplete? No
Evidence of Commercial Posting No

Case

Cases that this document belongs to:

Case ID Description Num Docs
[Case ID:839]
Case of Mr Hall who has various sores which might be venereal.
2


People linked to this document

Person IDRole in documentPerson
[PERS ID:1]AuthorDr William Cullen (Professor Cullen)
[PERS ID:1773]PatientMr Hall
[PERS ID:1]Patient's Physician / Surgeon / ApothecaryDr William Cullen (Professor Cullen)
[PERS ID:526]Patient's Physician / Surgeon / ApothecaryMr John Hunter

Places linked to this document

Role in document Specific Place Settlements / Areas Region Country Global Region Confidence
Place of Writing Cullen's House / Mint Close Edinburgh Edinburgh and East Scotland Europe certain

Normalized Text

[Page 1]

For Mr H.


The present ailments not venereal.


The disease contracted in 1769 seems to have been very
entirely cured in spring 1771 so that there was no suspicion
of any remaining taint for more than two years afterwards.


The infection of 1773. as it produced only a running and
as it neither renewed 1 the old nor produced new chancres, tho the
gleet continued a long time, it may be presumed it did not
communicate any tait to the blood and the more especially
as in the affair of 1769 the throat was very quickly affe¬
cted and here there was two years passed before there was any
suspicion of such an effect. -----


When in 1775 the throat became affected with disease
it was not only solong after the ambiguous ase of 1773
that it could hardly be imputed to that and it was pretty
manifestly owing to Cold which Mr H's constitution [reniders?] 2
him very obnoxious to. & especially in his throat. The conti¬
nuance indeed of this ailment may give suspicion of a
more permanent course, but we know many instances
of persons whose throats are affected by cold only and who
are almost never free from some inflammation or swelling



[Page 2]

and especially when such persons are negligent
with respect to cold & otherwise living very freely as
Mr H seems to have done.


To all these considerations we would join
this that there has not been any ulcerations in the
usual place, the tonsils; and that the present seat
of them is not only unusual but there appearance
us not of the common venereal kind.


All this makes us doubt of the nature of
Mr Hs ↑present↑ complaints. but still we are uncertain
& he' should proceed in some measure as if they were
Venereal.


He should [moderately?] employ some Mercury
but as his stomach &c are so irritable, not
internally; but by [injection?] till its effects are
evident in his mouth. these effects should be very
moderate but continued for some time, tosee how
fair the are capable of affecting the sore in the
roof of his
mouth - but we say no more on this as
Mr J. Hunter will direct him &c.


If the Mercury fairly tried has no effect on his ailment
he may use Dr Kennedy's Decoction or if that causes of
be bad, we shall advise him to a remedy; but -
we must first see the effects of the Mercury -----


Edinburgh August 20.
1776.

Notes:

1: Contexts implies this may be an error for 'removed'.

2: Possibly a copyist's error for 'renders'.

Diplomatic Text

[Page 1]

For Mr H.


The present ailments not venereal.


The disease contracted in 1769 seems to have been very
entirely cured in spring 1771 so that there was no suspicion
of any remaining taint for more than two years afterwards.


The infection of 1773. as it produced only a running and
as it neither renewed 1 the old nor produced new chancres, tho the
gleet continued a long time, it may be presumed it did not
communicate any tait to the blood and the more especially
as in the affair of 1769 the throat was very quickly affe¬
cted and here there was two years passed before there was any
suspicion of such an effect. -----


When in 1775 the throat became affected with disease
it was not only solong after the ambiguous ase of 1773
that it could hardly be imputed to that and it was pretty
manifestly owing to Cold which Mr H's constitution [reniders?] 2
him very obnoxious to. & especially in his throat. The conti¬
nuance indeed of this ailment may give suspicion of a
more permanent course, but we know many instances
of persons whose throats are affected by cold only and who
are almost never free from some inflammation or swelling



[Page 2]

and especially when such persons are negligent
with respect to cold & otherwise living very freely as
Mr H seems to have done.


To all these considerations we would join
this that there has not been any ulcerations in the
usual place, the tonsils; and that the present seat
of them is not only unusual but there appearance
us not of the common venereal kind.


All this makes us doubt of the nature of
Mr Hs ↑present↑ complaints. but still we are uncertain
& he' should proceed in some measure as if they were
Venereal.


He should [moderately?] employ some Mercury
but as his stomach &c are so irritable, not
internally; but by [injection?] till its effects are
evident in his mouth. these effects should be very
moderate but continued for some time, tosee how
fair the are capable of affecting the sore in the
roof of his
mouth - but we say no more on this as
Mr J. Hunter will direct him &c.


If the Mercury fairly tried has no effect on his ailmt.
he may use Dr Kennedy's Decoction or if that causes of
be bad, we shall advise him to a remedy; but -
we must first see the effects of the Mercury -----


Edinr Aug. 20.
1776.

Notes:

1: Contexts implies this may be an error for 'removed'.

2: Possibly a copyist's error for 'renders'.

XML

XML file not yet available.

Feedback

Send us specfic feeback about this document [DOC ID:3908]

Type
Comments
 

Please note that the Cullen Project team have now disbanded but your comments will be logged in our system and we will look at them one day...