Cullen

The Consultation Letters of Dr William Cullen (1710-1790) at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

 

[ID:869] From: Dr William Cullen (Professor Cullen) / To: [ADDRESSEE UNKNOWN] / Regarding: Mrs Maddie(?) Fordyce (Patient) / 19? January 1774 / (Outgoing)

Reply with of directions for Mrs Fordyce in the form of a retained, loose corrected draft in Cullen's own hand Cullen believes that 'the disorder is an hysteric affection'.

Facsimile

There are 2 images for this document.

[Page 1]


 

[Page 2]


 
 

Metadata

FieldData
DOC ID 869
RCPE Catalogue Number CUL/1/2/135
Main Language English
Document Direction Outgoing
Date19? January 1774
Annotation None
TypeAuthorial original
Enclosure(s) No enclosure(s)
Autopsy No
Recipe No
Regimen No
Letter of Introduction No
Case Note No
Summary Reply with of directions for Mrs Fordyce in the form of a retained, loose corrected draft in Cullen's own hand Cullen believes that 'the disorder is an hysteric affection'.
Manuscript Incomplete? No
Evidence of Commercial Posting No

Case

Cases that this document belongs to:

Case ID Description Num Docs
[Case ID:11]
Case of Mrs Fordyce diagnosed as having 'an Hysteric affection'.
4


People linked to this document

Person IDRole in documentPerson
[PERS ID:1]AuthorDr William Cullen (Professor Cullen)
[PERS ID:390]PatientMrs Maddie(?) Fordyce
[PERS ID:1]Patient's Physician / Surgeon / ApothecaryDr William Cullen (Professor Cullen)

Places linked to this document

Role in document Specific Place Settlements / Areas Region Country Global Region Confidence
Place of Writing Edinburgh Edinburgh and East Scotland Europe inferred
Destination of Letter Nairn East Highlands Scotland Europe inferred

Normalized Text

[Page 1]
For Mrs Fordyce


I have again considered this Case at great lei¬
sure and am still of the same opinion as before that
the disorder is an hysteric affection. The many and long
intervals it has admitted of, make it certain that there
is no topical organic disorder and that it must be ↑as↑ it
has certainly been a pure Spasmodic affection. On this
view there is no certain relief but from Opiates and I am
perswaded that these carried to a due degree will always
give relief. Some other antispasmodics and Carminatives
may contribute a little but it is a very little only.


In the use of Opiates in this Case there are three
circumstances to be attended to.


The first is the Costiveness they are liable to induce
it which Mrs Fordyce is naturally disposed to and if I
mistake not must have been found on to have at least a
share in bringing on her attacks. There is nothing there
fore more to be attended to than the preventing this Costive¬
ness
. The Andersons Pills may answer the purpose but
it is rare for persons to be constant ↑enough↑ in employing them
for removing preventing rather than removing the Costive¬
ness
. During the whole time of her pregnancy Mrs Fordyce
Should hardly go one day and never two without a stool
or the taking of her laxative, & this is more especially
to be attended to when she is taking Opiates

I agree to the use of the Andersons Pills chiefly be¬



[Page 2]

cause She is in the habit of them but I have found [the?]
frequent use of them very troublesome to pregnant [Women?]
and I would prefer Cream of Tartar, flowers of [Sulphur?]
or Manna or these combined as they may be found to an¬
swer and if it can be had & Mrs Fordyce can take it the
Castor Oil is perhaps the best of all.


The other circumstance to be attended to in the
use of Opiates is the presence of Fever. If pain
considerable I think Opiates are allowable tho Some
degree of fever is present and when it is any ways {illeg}
that the pain is Spasmodic and not inflammatory [there?]
is no doubt in the matter but I own that all this [requires?]
some Skill and discretion which however must be [trusted?]
to persons on the Spot. In the present Case I would
judge from the accounts given me that the feverishness
Supervenes but not immediately upon the Spasmodic
attack
and that it is rather a Sign of the pains going
of and therefore it is unnecessary to urge the Opiates
any further.

Diplomatic Text

[Page 1]
For Mrs Fordyce


I have again considered this Case at great lei¬
sure and am still of the same opinion as before that
the disorder is an hysteric affection. The many and long
intervals it has admitted of, make it certain that there
is no topical organic disorder and that it must be ↑as↑ it
has certainly been a pure Spasmodic affection. On this
view there is no certain relief but from Opiates and I am
perswaded that these carried to a due degree will always
give relief. Some other antispasmodics and Carminatives
may contribute a little but it is a very little only.


In the use of Opiates in this Case there are three
circumstances to be attended to.


The first is the Costiveness they are liable to induce
it which Mrs Fordyce is naturally disposed to and if I
mistake not must have been found on to have at least a
share in bringing on her attacks. There is nothing there
fore more to be attended to than the preventing this Costive¬
ness
. The Andersons Pills may answer the purpose but
it is rare for persons to be constant ↑enough↑ in employing them
for removing preventing rather than removing the Costive¬
ness
. During the whole time of her pregnancy Mrs Fordyce
Should hardly go one day and never two without a stool
or the taking of her laxative, & this is more especially
to be attended to when she is taking Opiates

I agree to the use of the Andersons Pills chiefly be¬



[Page 2]

cause She is in the habit of them but I have found [the?]
frequent use of them very troublesome to pregnant [Women?]
and I would prefer Cream of Tartar, flowers of [Sulphur?]
or Manna or these combined as they may be found to an¬
swer and if it can be had & Mrs Fordyce can take it the
Castor Oil is perhaps the best of all.


The other circumstance to be attended to in the
use of Opiates is the presence of Fever. If pain
considerable I think Opiates are allowable tho Some
degree of fever is present and when it is any ways {illeg}
that the pain is Spasmodic and not inflammatory [there?]
is no doubt in the matter but I own that all this [requires?]
some Skill and discretion which however must be [trusted?]
to persons on the Spot. In the present Case I would
judge from the accounts given me that the feverishness
Supervenes but not immediately upon the Spasmodic
attack
and that it is rather a Sign of the pains going
of and therefore it is unnecessary to urge the Opiates
any further.

XML

XML file not yet available.

Feedback

Send us specfic feeback about this document [DOC ID:869]

Type
Comments
 

Please note that the Cullen Project team have now disbanded but your comments will be logged in our system and we will look at them one day...