Cullen

The Consultation Letters of Dr William Cullen (1710-1790) at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

 

[ID:57] From: Dr William Cullen (Professor Cullen) / To: Mr Mee / Regarding: Anonymous (Patient) / 20 May 1769 / (Outgoing)

Reply 'For Mr Mee', concerning an unnamed patient whose condition is related to a number of tooth extractions.

Facsimile

There are 3 images for this document.

[Page 1]


 

[Page 2]


 

[Page 3]


 
 

Metadata

FieldData
DOC ID 57
RCPE Catalogue Number CUL/1/1/1/52
Main Language English
Document Direction Outgoing
Date20 May 1769
Annotation None
TypeScribal copy ( includes Casebook Entry)
Enclosure(s) No enclosure(s)
Autopsy No
Recipe Yes
Regimen No
Letter of Introduction No
Case Note No
Summary Reply 'For Mr Mee', concerning an unnamed patient whose condition is related to a number of tooth extractions.
Manuscript Incomplete? No
Evidence of Commercial Posting No

Case

Cases that this document belongs to:

Case ID Description Num Docs
[Case ID:252]
Case reported by Mr Mee of an unnamed patient whose disorder is related to a number of tooth extractions.
1


People linked to this document

Person IDRole in documentPerson
[PERS ID:1]AuthorDr William Cullen (Professor Cullen)
[PERS ID:49]AddresseeMr Mee
[PERS ID:1000]Patient
[PERS ID:1]Patient's Physician / Surgeon / ApothecaryDr William Cullen (Professor Cullen)
[PERS ID:49]Patient's Relative / Spouse / FriendMr Mee
[PERS ID:1130]Other Bernhard Siegfried Albinus

Places linked to this document

Role in document Specific Place Settlements / Areas Region Country Global Region Confidence
Place of Writing Cullen's House / Mint Close Edinburgh Edinburgh and East Scotland Europe certain

Normalized Text

[Page 1]
For Mr Mee


I have again & again considered the Case you was
pleased to lay before me & find it must have been both very
distressing to the patient & a little puzling to the Physician ~


I am not surprised that the latter has thought of every possible cause
but I must give it as my opinion that the disease is purely topical
& does not arise from any affection of the system and therefore it is
not gouty. As there is no mention of his ↑of a↑ being gouty family & it is
expressly said that the patient himself never had any symptom
of Gout I think there is no room for the supposition of Gout in
this case & more especially when the cause of a topical affection
is to me sufficiently evident. I think the Disease at first was no
other than a toothach or rheumatic affection but the extracting
so many teeth
has strained the Nerves & induced a singular
sensibility in all the contigous membranes. In this I judge
the Disease to consist, it will I this think account for all the
Phenomena that have followed & I have met with many
instances of the same kind tho never with any equal either in
degree or duration.


After the teeth were drawn I think there was but one
possible means of Cure which was either to destroy the Nerves chiefly
affected or to diminish their sensibility. We are told of a Convulsion
of the
Cheek cured by Albinus 1 cutting thro the infraorbital
Nerve
but in this case I think the parts affected have their Nerves
from trunks distributed on the Inside of the Jaw & without our reach
What is in our power therefore here is only to diminish the sensi¬
bility. For this purpose there is nothing very effectual but



[Page 2]

Opium & to obtain any durable effects of this it must be
applied directly to the part affected. I should expect that wearing
a plaister of Extract of Opium upon the cheek might answer
the purpose. If this is dissagreeable I would advise the cheek to
be bathed two or three times a day with the spirits ordered below
The should be applied warm & for that purpose the Vial without
being unstoped is to be set in a bason of warm water till the
spirits are sufficiently heated. I don't doubt but the Internal
Use of Opium has been upon occasion tried but it would not be
of durable effect & perhaps might seem hurtfull. I have subjoined
her a medicine which I have found usefull in chronic pains
It will indeed cure the Gout itself but always with very pernicious
effects so that if there should be more reason than I know of for
suspecting Gout in this case I would avoid this powder. These are
the advices I can at present offer but I regret that the Gentleman
did not thinks it proper to say what remedies have been already
employed, for the from the effects of these I should have judged
more certainly of the nature of the disease & been able perhaps
to suggest other advice. I think blistering might have been of
service but only as repeated several times. I expect nothing
from Formentations & little from Electricity. but I should have
certainly tried the last & I suppose it has been so. But in what
manner? for a good deal depends on that. If your friend should
be pleased to give you any farther information I shall also be ready
to say farther what I can upon the subject.

I am
Sir
W C
Edinburgh 20th May 1769



[Page 3]
For Mr Mee

Take half an ounce of Opium, two ounces of Camphor., two drachms of Sassafras Oil sixteen ounces of Spir. Vin. rectif.. Let it digest in a [clear bottle for four days?] & strain. Label: The Anodyne Tincture for bathing the cheek.

Take one ounce of Gentian. root, two drachms of Orange Peel and one drachm of Ginger root. [Rub the powder {illeg}?]. Label: Anodyne Powder to be taken three times a [day?]

W C
20th May 1769

Notes:

1: Bernhard Siegfried Albinus (originally Weiss) (1697–1770), a German-born, Dutch anatomist and author of Tabulae sceleti et musculorum corporis humani (Leiden:1747). Precise reference untraced.

Diplomatic Text

[Page 1]
For Mr Mee


I have again & again considered the Case you was
pleased to lay before me & find it must have been both very
distressing to the patient & a little puzling to the Physician ~


I am not surprised that the latter has thought of every possible cause
but I must give it as my opinion that the disease is purely topical
& does not arise from any affection of the system and therefore it is
not gouty. As there is no mention of his ↑of a↑ being gouty family & it is
expressly said that the patient himself never had any symptom
of Gout I think there is no room for the supposition of Gout in
this case & more especially when the cause of a topical affection
is to me sufficiently evident. I think the Disease at first was no
other than a toothach or rheumatic affection but the extracting
so many teeth
has strained the Nerves & induced a singular
sensibility in all the contigous membranes. In this I judge
the Disease to consist, it will I this think account for all the
Phenomena that have followed & I have met with many
instances of the same kind tho never with any equal either in
degree or duration.


After the teeth were drawn I think there was but one
possible means of Cure which was either to destroy the Nerves chiefly
affected or to diminish their sensibility. We are told of a Convulsion
of the
Cheek cured by Albinus 1 cutting thro the infraorbital
Nerve
but in this case I think the parts affected have their Nerves
from trunks distributed on the Inside of the Jaw & without our reach
What is in our power therefore here is only to diminish the sensi¬
bility. For this purpose there is nothing very effectual but



[Page 2]

Opium & to obtain any durable effects of this it must be
applied directly to the part affected. I should expect that wearing
a plaister of Extract of Opium upon the cheek might answer
the purpose. If this is dissagreeable I would advise the cheek to
be bathed two or three times a day with the spirits ordered below
The should be applied warm & for that purpose the Vial without
being unstoped is to be set in a bason of warm water till the
spirits are sufficiently heated. I don't doubt but the Internal
Use of Opium has been upon occasion tried but it would not be
of durable effect & perhaps might seem hurtfull. I have subjoined
her a medicine which I have found usefull in chronic pains
It will indeed cure the Gout itself but always with very pernicious
effects so that if there should be more reason than I know of for
suspecting Gout in this case I would avoid this powder. These are
the advices I can at present offer but I regret that the Gentleman
did not thinks it proper to say what remedies have been already
employed, for the from the effects of these I should have judged
more certainly of the nature of the disease & been able perhaps
to suggest other advice. I think blistering might have been of
service but only as repeated several times. I expect nothing
from Formentations & little from Electricity. but I should have
certainly tried the last & I suppose it has been so. But in what
manner? for a good deal depends on that. If your friend should
be pleased to give you any farther information I shall also be ready
to say farther what I can upon the subject.

I am
Sir
W C
Edinr 20th May 1769



[Page 3]
For Mr Mee


Opij ℥ſs
Camphor. ℥ij
Ol. Sassafras ʒij
Spir. Vin. rectif. ℥xvj
Digere vase [clause per qualuor dies?] & cola
Signa the Anodyne Ti↑n↑cture for bathing the cheek


℞ Rad. Gentian. ℥j
Cort. Aurantiore ʒij
Rad Zingiber ʒj
[Terantur in pulvarem subliem?]
Signa the Anodyne Powder half a dram to be taken
three times a [dimes?]

W C
20th May 1769

Notes:

1: Bernhard Siegfried Albinus (originally Weiss) (1697–1770), a German-born, Dutch anatomist and author of Tabulae sceleti et musculorum corporis humani (Leiden:1747). Precise reference untraced.

XML

XML file not yet available.

Feedback

Send us specfic feeback about this document [DOC ID:57]

Type
Comments
 

Please note that the Cullen Project team have now disbanded but your comments will be logged in our system and we will look at them one day...